Sh v r 2012 nswcca 79

WebSH v The Queen [2012] NSWCCA 79 29 The Queen v GW [2016] HCA 6 29 30 Interpreters 30 31 Deaf and mute witnesses 30 R v Gulam Mohammad Khan (1995 unreported NSWSC) …

Uniform Evidence Manual - Judicial College

WebCourt tells witness those things set out in s 13(5)(a)-(c) in full – SH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79. Also, see A2 v R; Magennis v R; Vaziri v R [2024] NSWCCA 174 – competence assessed at the time of adducing evidence at trial not in retrospect (such as the time of recording the initial investigative interview for a ‘vulnerable’ witness) Issues ... WebStudy Evidence Cases flashcards from Ash Kelso's class online, or in Brainscape's iPhone or Android app. Learn faster with spaced repetition. phones and international travel https://chiriclima.com

Sh v R [2012] NSWCCA 79 - Student Law Notes

WebApr 28, 2024 · In resentencing the Applicant, this Court should apply s.16A(2)(g) in its present form which gives effect to aspects of the utilitarian value of a guilty plea as described in Xiao v R and Bae v R. The Applicant’s guilty pleas for the Commonwealth offences were entered at an early stage of the proceeding when still before the Local Court. Webthe witness to give evidence. These matters were made clear by the NSWCCA in SH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79; 83 NSWLR 258; 222 A Crim R 43 at [7]-[8] where Basten JA stated: “[7] Section 13 was amended by the Evidence Amendment Act 2007 (NSW) ("the 2007 Amendment Act"), which commenced operation on 1 January 2009. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNDAULawRw/2013/4.pdf phones and electronics background

Criminal matters - important cases

Category:Child witnesses - Trial Directions

Tags:Sh v r 2012 nswcca 79

Sh v r 2012 nswcca 79

Appeals to the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal ODPP

WebApr 24, 2015 · In The Queen v GW [2016] HCA 6 delivered today (2 Mar 2016), the High Court has unanimously allowed an appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutions for the ACT (the DPP) from [2015] ACTCA 15, decided on 24 April 2015, a decision of the ACT Court of Appeal. The High Court has found that the Uniform Evidence Legislation (the UEL) is … WebAug 24, 2024 · In Rogerson v The Queen [2024] NSWCCA 160, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal held at [542]–[547] that, in the light of the approach taken by the High Court in R v Bauer (2024) 266 CLR 56; 92 ALJR 846; [2024] HCA 40 to appellate review of s 97, the appropriate standard of appellate review in respect of this provision is "the correctness ...

Sh v r 2012 nswcca 79

Did you know?

WebIt is not concerned with whether that direction is understood or even acknowledged (R v Muller (2013) 7 ACTLR 296; [2013] ACTCA 15 at [41] per Dowsett J (Penfold J and Nield … Web2012 CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2012 A Year of Legislative Activity and Appellate Decisions Concerning the Criminal Law Relevant to the Local Court The Honourable Justice Robert …

WebBefore commencement of the second trial the prosecutor told the Court that the from LPAB 02 at The University of Sydney WebJun 1, 2016 · The victim was at home late at night when he heard voices. Outside, he was confronted by about ten men, some of them armed with bats and pieces of wood. One of them threatened him. The accused, Swan, was one of the members of the group. Things were thrown at the victim, he and his house were hit, and he took his daughter to safety.

http://www.supremecourt.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Publications/Speeches/Pre-2015%20Speeches/Hulme%20RA/rahulme010812.pdf WebSH v R (2012) 83 NSWLR 258; [2012] NSWCCA 79 Sexual assault of child under 10. Complainant was main witness. Gave unsworn evidence. Appeal on basis of lack of …

WebKannis v R [2024] NSWCCA 79 — Applicant re-sentenced as reliance upon dissimilar sentencing decisions and sentencing range at [8-0355] BC v R [2024] NSWCCA 111 ... PD …

WebNational Commercial Banking Corporation of Australia Limited v Hedley (1984) NSW ConvR 55-211; Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538; Suggest a case What people say about Law … how do you spell understandingWeb2 R v Horton-Hegarty [2024] ACTCA 22 R v Meyboom [2012] ACTCA 48 R v Minnis (unreported, Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, Higgins CJ, 4 May 2009 ) R v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272; 164 A Crim R 481 R v Mumberson [2011] NSWCCA 54 R v Pham [2015] HCA 39; 256 CLR 550 R v SAG [2004] QCA 286 ; 147 A Crim R 301 R v Toumo’ua … how do you spell unintentionalWebJan 8, 2024 · In the case of SH v R [2012] NSWCCA 79, the defendant appealed against his conviction for having sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 10 years. The basis … how do you spell unicorn toyWebv RAG [2006] NSWCCA 343; R v Cooper (2007) 214 FLR 92; RJ v The Queen (2010) 208 A Crim R 174; SH v The Queen (2012) 83 NSWLR 258. These cases are discussed in Part II. 12 In such a case, the court cannot apply the proviso in, eg, Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 6; see also R v WG (2010) 199 A Crim R 218, 225 [35]–[36] (The Court); SH v The ... how do you spell uniformWebSwan v. The Queen Case No. S291/2024. Case Information. Lower Court Judgment. 23/11/2024 Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Criminal Appeal) (Bathurst CJ, … phones and school busesWebCollier v R [2012] NSWCCA 213 , , , Colomer v R [2014] NSWCCA 51 [ 11-145 ] Commissioner of Taxation v Baffsky (2001) 122 A Crim R 568 [ 16-020 ] phones are evilWebR v Purdon [1996] NSWCCA 60659 (Unreported, Hunt CJ at CL, McInerney and Donovan AJ, 27 March 1997) Deterrence Custodial Sentence: R v Qin [2008] NSWCCA 189: Federal Offenders Liable for Deportation: R v Quinn [2012] SASCFC 102: Physical Condition: R v R L P [2009] VSCA 271: Age: R v Rakiba [2014] ACTSC 373: Deterrence: R v Reiner (1974) 8 … how do you spell uniform clothes